Tok Essay Can We Trust Our Emotions in the Pursuit of Knowledge?

contour awarded B standard A6 beat B7 Criterion C6 Criterion D7 Total26 This is a better essay. Despite about localized difficulties (for example, take outs 1011, confusion with the truth tests, melodic line 76, error with a priori) in that location is some sense of personal exp unityntiation and the essay does consistently identify applicable knowledge issues. Criterion A Understanding knowledge issues Mark awarded 6 The essay is consistently relevant to the title and there is evidence of real ambition and some go about to use profound ideas (specifically Godels ideas (lines 2026) and the evolutionary ideas of lines 9697).However, the ideas atomic number 18 not always used effectively there is clearly some understanding but it falls short of a good understanding. In particular, there is aw beness that the idea of truth is problematic (for example, the introduction and lines 1819) and its meaning is explored in different areas of knowledge (mathematics, art, history, eth ics, religion) and everyday events (the Iraq war, the table), but the discussion of the issue is uneven and at times inconsistent. Criterion B apprehenders perspective Mark awarded 7The essay has a clear savant voice, starting with an engaging introduction which understandsbut is not prepared to encouragetotal skepticism despite the clumsy formulation (lines 45) one senses an awareness of alternative perspectives and a personal stand. The examples are appropriate, varied and pretty effective (for example, lines 3133, the gamelan lines 2026, a brave, if not entirely successful, strain to concisely explain Godels ideas lines 5155, Texan law lines 5675, Iraq lines 3941, Hiroshima and Nagasaki).The quality and quantity show that the student can singly link the ideas to personal, academic and real-life situations, and are a strong feature of this essay. Criterion C Quality of epitome of knowledge issues Mark awarded 6 The analysis of issues is weaker than their identification, an d the precise links between context and truth are not specified (for example, the examples of the gamelan and Dawkins are both potentially rich but undeveloped).While there is a sense of exploring the idea of truth in different contexts, the head lacks depth and detail, and some conclusions are not adequately supported (for example, line 18, the conclusion However contexts is supported by examples from non-mathematical contexts line 13, make quaternion because is an apparently unaware argument from authority lines 2026, Godels ideas are not used adequately lines 2830, Perceptions view and place is maintain rather than argued for).It might be argued that the extensive treatment of the Iraq war, while sure showcasing the students perspective on the issue, might be clean polemical rather than carefully argued. Claims of emotive language, colourful fallacies (lines 6768) are not elaborated upon and, in the overall picture of the essay, this example seems to depart the overall conc lusion that Margaret Atwood was right when she said that context is all (line 101). Criterion D Organization of ideas