Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perking Gilman Essay

In the article Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perking Gilman Architects of female power the author attempts to canvas and contrast the convictions and beliefs of Charlotte Gilman and, her great-aunt, Catharine Beecher. One of the most important factors that is seen repeatedly in the article, is the judgment that the environment encompassing the home is the center of all commerce for a woman. This thought process continues to build and establishes the idea that what begins in the home continues to emit out into the lives of the woman and her family. Each female author further attempt to define the roles of a woman directly corresponding with the roles beginning in a womans private life and extending into the public life. Although Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Gilman had all in all different interpretations of this ideology, the fact that the foundation of the argument was the same purports that the concept, regardless of interpretation, could take a shit some basis on reality. The author of this article, Valerie Gill, very thoroughly cites from non only Catharine Beechers books A Treatise on Domestic Economy and American Womans Home, but also from Charlotte Gilmans book travel the Mountain and several of her lectures and articles including an article titled Applepieville. Gill (1998) states, that Like Catharine Beecher, Gilman cerebrate the role of the women to the general health of the social system the dependent and separated situation of women in their homes (p. 2). Gill (1998) goes on to further state that In spite of their different strategies for defining and locating women, however, Beecher and Gilman sh atomic number 18 an interest in the topography of female experience and that Both writers conceptualize the identity of women in spacial as well as socioeconomic terms, assuming that the fulfillment of their throw sex can be quite literally mapped out. (p. 2). The article whence moves into much greater detail, analyzing from each one womans many forms of printed material.The tip and degree of information and detail written in this article close to each represented author and their contributing works can ultimately beseen as one of the articles main strengths. However, although this article gives a wide amount of information on the womens opinions and beliefs the article at multiplication seems disassembled and erratic. The flow of the article is somewhat hard to follow, and without an increased measure of concentration, the readiness of the reader to comprehend and decipher whom the author is speaking of can be lost. Also, with the extensive amounts of information and detail that each female author contributes to the argument, readers are bombarded with data to interpret and distinguish upon. With the author of the article not decisively choosing the strongest points of argument from each author, the information becomes overwhelming and possibly confusing at times.The article Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perki ng Gilman Architects of female power attempts to give readers two different perspectives of a womans role in her home and how this affects her presence in society. Readers are given a multitude of supporting facts from both womens interpretations on the topic. This fact, in certain circumstances, proves to be not only a strength of the article but also a weakness. Regardless of how each woman author interpreted these ideals, the simple fact remains release that each assumed the role and presence of a woman becomes clearly defined as beginning in the home.ReferencesGill, V. (1998). Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perking Gilman Architects of female power. diary of American Culture, 21 (2). Retrieved from http//ctcdns02.ctcd.edu2122/search/multiSearch.dojsessionid=F6C4B68D9202464AFE8BAF1AC27987B8